Ahmadiyya Muslim Community Myths Examined (Pt 2-3)

· Ahmadiyya Sect
Authors

AhmadiyyaMuslimCommunity Myths Examined pt2/3

Hazrat Mirza’s Writings – Haqeeqat-ul-Wahy(The Truth about Revelation

Extracts from Hazrat Mirza’s own writings show his perception of Prophet hood and his role in it. He declares that those who do not accept him, Mirza, as Prophet, are NOT OF ISLAM. He abrogates 164 Jihad verses from the Quran. All this is extracted from his own writings that have been referenced.
‘ROOHANI KHAZAIN’ is the title for the collection of all the books by Mirza Ghulam, printed by the Ahmadiyya Movement Headquarter in London.

Contents

less


Link to Part 1: http://knol.google.com/k/mbp-lee/ahmadiyya-muslim-community-myths/1l23x9udotn1a/73#edit

HAZRAT MIRZA’S BOLD  DECLARATIONS FOR ACCEPTANCE AS PROPHET

In Hazrat Mirza’s attempts to convince the British Raj of his and his family’s loyalty to the Raj,  and his ability to lead the Islamic Jihadist resistance  from attacking the British establishments, Hazrat Mirza had to diffuse the concept of (Islamic) Jihad within orthodox Islam.  He realised that the only way to convince the Islamists was from within Islam and that was to “abrogate” Islamic Jihad . To have any credibility and authority for such an act (abrogation), it was essential that he had the status not only as a scholar of Islam but that he became a prophet of Islam. And this was what he set himself to do for the rest of his life. He first began with the concept that he was the “promised Messiah of the Christians, but he also appointed himself as the “promised Mahdi of the Muslims.” But many Muslim were sceptical and so he had to devise greater and greater elaborate arguments to support his claims. The two parts of this article together piece together Hazrat Mirza’s attempts to convince orthodox Muslims to follow his teachings. The following are some of his declarations (with source of his writings.)

“Except for the Children of Prostitutes … everyone accepts me as Prophet of Allah

1: “Except for the CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTE, whose hearts have been sealed by God, everyone else believes in me and has accepted me (as Prophet of Allah.)”
(Aina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Roohani Khazain vol.5 p.547)

“He who has not accepted me (Mirza) as Prophet is not a Muslim”

2: “God(Allah) has revealed to me(Mirza) that anyone to whom my message (that I am a Prophet of Allah) has reached and he has not accepted me (Mirza as Prophet), he is not a Muslim.”
(Letter of Mirza to Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan Patialvi)

He who does not follow me (HAZRAT MIRZA) is Disobedient of Allah.

3: “I have God’s (Allah’s) inspiration that he who does not follow me (Hazrat Mirza) and will not enter my Ba’ith (House) and remains my opponent, he is disobedient of God (Allah) and His Prophet, Hellish.”
(Advertisement in M’ayaar-ul-Akhyar by Mirza Ghulam p.8)

It is Forbidden to pray behind those who disbeliever that Hazrat is Prophet.

4: “Thus remember as God(Allah) has informed me, it is forbidden and absolutely forbidden to pray behind any disbeliever (that Hazrat Mirza is a Prophet) and hesitant; but it should be that your Imam should be one of you. (Arbaeen No 3, Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.417 footnote)
(In other words, an Ahmadi is forbidden to pray behind a non-Ahmadi.)

5: Some one asked a question and Mirza has replied to it. Both are mentioned in his book, Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi. I quote:

“Question:
———–
Huzoor-e-aali has mentioned in thousands of places that it is not at all right to call KAFIR a Kalima-go (one who recites a Kalima) and an Ahle-Qibla. It is quite obvious that except those Momineen who become Kafir by rejecting you, just by not accepting you no one becomes a Kafir. But you write to Abdul Hakeem Khan that anyone who has received my message and he has not accepted me, he is not Muslim. There is contradiction between this statement and the statements in previous books. Earlier in Tiryaq-ul-Quloob etc you had mentioned that no one becomes Kafir by not accepting you and now you are writing that by rejecting me he becomes a Kafir.

Answer:
———
This is strange that you consider the person who rejects me (Hazrat Mirza) and the person who calls me a Kafir as two different persons, whereas in the eyes of God (Allah) he is the same type; because he who does not accept me (as Prophet)is because he considers me a fabricator…..apart from this, he who does not accept me, he does not believe in God (Allah) and His Prophet as well, because there is God’s (Allah’s) and his Prophet’s prophesy regarding me.”
(Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.167)

Non Ahmadis are Non-Muslims

6: ” It is our obligation that we do not consider non-Ahmadis as Muslims and do not pray behind them, because for us they have rejected on Prophet (Mirza Ghulam) of God (Allah). This is a religious matter and no one has any right to do anything in it.”
(Anwar-e-Khilafat, by Mirza Mahmood, Khalifa 2, p.90)

7: ” All Muslims who are not included in the initiation of Maseeh Mowood, even if they have not heard of the name of Maseeh Mowood, they are Kafir and out of the fold of Islam. I admit that these are my beliefs.”
(Aina-e-Sadaqat, by Mirza Mahmood, 2nd Khalifa, p.35)

Non-Ahmadis are out of the Fold of Islam

8: “Every one who accepts Moses but not Eisa or accepts Eisa but not Mohammad or accepts  Mohammad but not Maseeh Mowood, he is not not only Kafir but a hardened Kafir and is OUT OF THE FOLD OF ISLAM.”
(Kalimat-alFasl by Mirza Basheer Ahmad s/o Mirza Ghulam p.110)

Question:
————
“Is it permitted to say May God (Allah) Bless the departed soul, forgive him and send him to Paradise for a person who was not included in Ahmadiyyat?”

Answer:
———-
“The KUFR of non-Ahmadis is proven by evident signs and it is not permitted to ask for forgiveness for non-believers (KUFFAR).”
(Al-Fazl Qadian vol.8, No. 59, 7th Feb 1921)

9: “Non-Ahmadis are the disbelievers therefore their funeral prayers should not be offered, but if an infant of non-ahmadi dies, why should we not pray his funeral prayer, he is not a disbeliever of Maseeh Mowood? I ask the inquirer, that if this is true than why don’t we offer funeral prayer of a Hindu or a Christian child? How many people offer their funeral prayer?” (Anwar-e-Khilafat, Mirza Mahmood, 2nd Khalifa, p.93)

10: “It is the order of Hazrat Maseeh Mowood and firm order that no Ahmadi should give his daughter to non-Ahmadi. It is obligatory on every Ahmadi to carry it out….. there is great loss in it, besides this marriage is not permitted.”
(Barakat-e-Khilafat by Mirza Mehmood p.73)

11: “Our prayers are separate from Non-Ahmadis, it is forbidden to give our girls to them, we are stopped to offer their funeral prayers. Now what is left that we can participate with them? There are only two kinds of relations – religious and worldly. For religious relations, it is the gathering for prayers and for worldly relations, it is the marriage and both are forbidden for us.”
(Mirza Basheer Ahmad s/o Mirza Ghulam, Kalimat alFasl p.169)

The Promised Messiah(Hazrat Mirza) is Prophet Muhammad Reincarnated

12: “The point is now quite clear. If it is ‘Kufr’ (infidelity) to deny the Gracious Prophet Muhammad, pbuh, it must also be ‘Kufr’ to deny the Promised Messiah, because the Promised Messiah is in no way a separate being from the Gracious Prophet (Muhammad); rather he is the same (Muhammad incarnate.)  If anyone is not deemed a Kafir for denying the Promised Messiah, then anyone else who denies the Gracious Prophet also cannot be considered a Kafir. How is it possible that denying him in his first birth as Prophet should be regarded as Kufr, but denying him in his (reincarnated) second birth as Prophet should not be regarded as Kufr, when, as claimed by the Promised Messiah, his (Mirza’s birth as Muhammad incarnate)( spiritual attainment is stronger, complete and severe.”
(Kalimatul Fasl, pages 146-147, as cited in the Review of Religions, dated March-April 1915)  [1]

WINDOW DRESSING THE QADIANI MOVEMENT

Mirza Qadiani set about creating his Qadiani movement with bold and grandiose statements some of which has not been substantiated. But later in life he mellowed and attempted to modify some of his earlier claims that he found was unpalatable to the (Sunni & Shia) Muslims. His followers too, who were initially inspired with his claims later attempted to water down the most repugnant of his claims. In this attempt to understand Mirza Qadiani it is essential to quote directly and unmodified from his works as well as from other Ahmadi dignitaries. For this section of the work I have found Dr. Syed Rashid Ali’s contributions most illuminating. [2]

Mirza Qadiani Claims Equal Status to Prophet Muhammad

 

Mirza Qadiani said:

“‘Muhammadur Rasoolullah wal lazeena m’ahoo, ashiddao ‘ala alkuffare rohamao bainahum’ in this revelation God (Allah) has named me Mohammed and Messenger as well.”
(Roohani Khazain vol. 18 p.207)

Mirza Qadiani said: “Holy Prophet has two advents or in other words you can say that in one Buroozi way coming again of Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) was promised which has been fulfilled by the appearance of Promised Messiah and Promised Mahdi.”
(Roohani Khazain vol. 17 p.249)

Mirza Qadiani says:

“I have said several times that according to the verse (of Holy Quran) ‘wa akhareena minhum lamma yalhaqoo behim’ as Burooz (partial Prophet/saint) I am the same prophet, the Khatamul Anbiyyah, and 230 years ago God (Allah) named me Mohammed and Ahmad in Braheen-e-Qadianism and declared me His Being.”
(Aik ghalti ka azala, Roohani Khazain vol. 18 p.212)

Mirza Qadiani said:

“The Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) had two births as a Prophet. In other words, we may say that it was promised that the Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) would be born in the world once more (reincarnated) and this was fulfilled by the incarnation of the Promised Messiah and the Promised Mahdi.”
(Tohfa-e-Golravia, Roohani Khazain vol. 17 p.249)

Mirza said:

“When I am the Holy Prophet incarnate and when all the accomplishments of Muhammad including the prophet hood are reflected in my mirror of my shadiness, then who is the man who has claimed prophet hood in a separate being?” (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, Roohani Khazain, vol.18, p.212)

Such beliefs and writings of Mirza Qadiani led his follower to express boldly their beliefs in following terms. Mirza Basheer Qadiani s/o Mirza Qadiani says:

“Maseeh Mowood is not a separate thing from Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him), but it is He Himself who has come again in this world in Buroozi form…..therefore is there any doubt that God (Allah) has sent Holy Prophet again in Qadian?” (Kalimat Alfasl p.104-105, Review of Religions Qadian March 1915)

“Now it is clear if rejectin Holy Prophet is KUFR then rejecting Promised Messiah should also be KUFR. because promised Messiah is nothing separate from Holy Prophet, but it is Him and if he who rejects Promised Messiah is not is not KAFIR then the rejecter of Holy Prophet is also no Kafir, God forbid.” 

(Kalimat alFasl p.146-147 Review of Religion, Qadian, Mar-Apr 1915)

“Thus does any dount remain that God (Allah) has sent Muhammad ((may Peace Be Upon Him)) again in Qadian to fulfill his promist?” (Kalimat alFasl by Mirza Basheer Qadiani, Review of Religions p.105, No.3, vol.14) [2]

MIRZA CLAIMS EQUALITY WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD

Mirza said: “Anyone who differentiates between me and MUSTAFA ((may Peace Be Upon Him)), he has not seen me and has not recognized me.” (Roohani Khazain vol. 16 p.171)

Official Qadiani mouthpiece, Al-Fazl from Qadian wrote:

“The entity of the promised Masih (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him). In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised Masih and the holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him). Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name. Although verbally they are two, yet in reality they are one and the same”. (Al-Fazl, Qadian, vol.3, No.37, dated 16th September 1915, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab page 207, 9th edition, Lahore.)

 

The Ahmadiyya Shahada (Qadiani Kalima)


Hazrat Mirza had to find a way around the original Shahada followed by generations of Muslims before him, because he has introduced himself as a Prophet, succeeding the Prophet Muhammad. And this is how he got around this convention.

BUT with the advent of Promised Messiah, ONE MORE PROPHET HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE MEANING OF Muhammad UR RASOOLULLAH …… thus to enter in Islam it is still the same Kalima, the only difference is that the advent of Promised Messiah has added one more prophet to its meaning…we don’t need a new Kalima, because Promised Messiah is nothing separate from Holy Prophet, as he says: ‘saara wujoodi wujoodahoo (my person became his person)‘ and ‘he who differentiates between me and Mustafa has not seen me and not recognizes me’…..thus Promised Messiah is Muhammad Rasoolullah himself who has come again in this world to spread Islam, therefore we do not need any new Kalima. Yes if someone else had come then we may have required it — thus think all of you.” (KalimatAlFasl p.158 by Mirza Basheer Qadiani)

“Moreover, even if we accept by supposing the impossible that the sacred name of the Gracious Prophet ((may Peace Be Upon Him)) has been included in the sacred Kalima because He is the Last of the Prophets, even then there is no harm and we do not need a new Kalima because the Promised Messiah is not a separate entity from the gracious Prophet as he (Mirza) himself says: “My being is exactly the being of Muhammadur Rasoolu Llah”. Also, “One who discriminates between me and Mustafa has neither recognized me nor seen me”. And the reason for this is Allah Almighty’s promise that He would reincarnate “Khatam un Nabieen” in this world once more as a prophet as is evident from the verse “And others of them… Thus the Promised Messiah (Mirza Qadiani) is himself Muhammadur Rasoolu Llah, who has been incarnated in the world again to spread Islam. We do not, therefore, need any new Kalima. Albeit, a new Kalima would have been necessary, if some other person had been reincarnated instead of Muhammadur Rasool Llah. So contemplate!” (Kalimatul Fasl, page 158)
Thus Mirza Qadiani says:’One of the objections of the ignorants is also this that the followers of this man (Mirza) apply on him the words [‘alaihe assalato wa assalam] and to say this is HARAM. The answer to this is that I am the Promised Messiah, and leave aside the saying of Salaat and Salaam, Holy Prophet Himself said that he who finds him, convey His salaam to him; and in all Hadiths at hundreds of places Salaat-o-salaam is mentioned for the Promised Messiah. When such words about me are said by The Prophet, Sahaba has said, rather God has said, then how can it be Haram for my Jama’at to say such words for me.” (Risala Durood Shareef, Arba’een No.2 Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.349)

The Revelations (Wahi) of Mirza Qadiani

Mirza Qadiani began to openly reveal the revelations he had received. This reveals much of the mind of this man Mirza:

“The basis for our claims is not Hadith but Quran and that Wahi which comes to me. Yes, in support we also present those Hadith which are according to Quran and DO NOT CONTRADICT MY WAHI. Rest of the Hadith, I THROW THEM AWAY LIKE A WASTE PAPER.” (Roohani Khazain vol.19 p.140)

“In Braheen-e-Qadianism, God has called me by the name of Ibrahim……” (Arba’een No.3, Roohani Khazain, vol.17 p.420)

“My teachings contain orders as well as prohibitions and renovation of important injunctions of the Shari’at. For this reason God has named my teachings and the ‘wahi’ (revelation) that comes to me as a ‘boat. Thus see, God has declared my ‘wahi’, my teachings and allegiance with me to be Noah’s Ark and the basis of salvation for all human beings. Let he who has eyes may see and he who has ears may hear.” (Arba’een, Vol. 4, footnote of page 6; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 435).

“I say with swearing upon God that I believe in these inspirations in the same way as I believe in Quran and other books of God. And just as I consider Quran undoubtedly and surely the book of God, similarly I believe that that wahi which descends upon me is the word of God.” (Haqeetqatul Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.220)

“I have similar faith in my Wahi as on Holy Quran and Torah.” (Arba’een No.4 , Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.454)

“and the Word of God descended so much on me that if it is collected it will not be less than 20 parts.” (Haqeeqatul Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.407)

Mirza Better than Holy Prophet Muhammad (may Peace Be Upon Him) (ma’azAllah): However Mirza Qadiani was still not satisfied with his progress. He wanted to improve further. Was it spiritual evolution or delusions of grandeur, it is anyone’s guess. His next step was claiming superiority and excellence over Holy Prophet Muhammad (may Peace Be Upon Him). He said:

“But the fact is that the spirituality of Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) (in the form of Mirza Ghulam) in this end of the sixth millennium, that is in these days, is much more stronger and perfect and forceful as compared to those (first) years, like a full moon.” (Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, Roohani Khazain vol. 16 p.271)

“The spirituality of our holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) was conceived in 5th thousand (i.e. Makki birth) with its precise attributes and that period was not the climax of his spirituality’s development. It was rather the first step to the highest pinnacle of its perfection. Thereafter this spirituality manifested itself in its full glamour during the 6th thousand (his rebirth in Qadian) at the present time”. (Mirza in Khutba-e-llhamiyah, Roohani Khazain, Vol.16, p.266)

He pointed to his followers that he has been given 300,000 signs and miracles whereas Holy Prophet was given just 3000. Praising himself, he wrote in his poetry: “For the Holy Prophet God showed only the sign of Eclipse of Moon But for me he has shown the sign of Eclipse of both Moon and Sun, thus will you disbelieve me.” (Aijaz-e-Qadiani, Roohani Khazain vol.19 p.183)

He claimed that certain concealed or secret meanings of Holy Quran were not revealed to the Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him), but he has been informed about them. Thus Holy Prophet did not understand the meaning of Ibne Maryam, Dajjal, Donkey of Dajjal, Gog and Magog, Daabatul Ardh. (Izala-e-Auham, Roohani Khazain vol.3 p.473)

“The Islam (of Holy Prophet) started like a new moon and it was destined to become (during the time of Mirza) like a full moon.” (Roohani Khazain vol.16 p.184)

“And it is obvious that the Fath-e-Mubeen (Distinct Victory) came during the time of our Prophet and another Victory remained, which is much greater and more obvious; and it was destined that its time would be the period of Promised Messiah.” (Roohani Khazain vol.16 p.288)

Following poetry was recited in front of Mirza Qadiani by a follower. Mirza is reported to have said: ‘JazakAllah’ and after having written it in beautiful calligraphy, hung it in his house. “Muhammad has descended again amongst us and is greater in his glory than before He who wants to see Muhammad in perfection Should look at Ghulam Ahmad in Qadian.” (Qazi Zahoor Ahmad Akmal Qadiani, printed in Qadiani Newspaper Paigham-us Sulh dated 14th March 1916)

“The mental development of the Promised Messiah (i.e. the Mirza Qadiani) was higher than that of the Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him). And this is only a part of the superiority which the Promised Messiah has over the Holy Prophet. The mental faculties of the Holy Prophet could not manifest fully owing to the deficiency of civilization; although the ability existed. They have now manifested themselves fully through the Promised Masih by virtue of the advancement of civilization.” (Review of Religions, May 1929, Qadiani Mazhab, p.266, 9th Ed. Lahore)

Mirza further degrades Holy Prophet Muhammad (may Peace Be Upon Him) Holy Prophet Muhammad (may Peace Be Upon Him) did not understand the correct meaning of Surah AlZilzal. (Roohani Khazain vol.3 pp.166-167)

Holy Prophet’s revelation also turned out to be false. (Roohani Khazain vol.3 p.472)

Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) has also committed mistakes in understanding revelations. (Roohani Khazain 2 vol. 2 p.224)

Grave of the Holy Prophet is one of the Most Sacred site for Muslims all over the world. This is how Mirza humiliates it (May Allah and His Messenger forgive me for quoting such profanity):

“And God chose such a DESPICABLE PLACE to bury the Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) which is EXTREMELY STINKING and DARK and CRAMPED and was the PLACE of the EXCRETA of INSECTS…” (Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.205)

Mirza Qadiani finally claims to be the FINAL PROPHET

Having evolved the basis for his claims that he believed would be accepted he finally claimed to be THE FINAL PROPHET.

“Time and again I have said that according to the verse ‘wa aakhareena minhum lamma yalhaqoo behim – and others of them who have not yet joined them..’(al-Quran 62:3)in BUROOZI (partial-sainthood) form (translated by Qadianis as Image/Alter-ego/Counter-type) I am the same prophet, the KHATUM-UL-ANBIYA (Last of the Prophets). And twenty years ago God named me Muhammad and Ahmad in Braheen-e-Qadianism, and declared that I am the Holy Prophet’s (may Peace Be Upon Him) incarnation. Thus my prophethood in no way clashes with the status of Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) as the Last of Prophets, because shadow is inseparable from the original. Since I am Muhammad in a ‘shadowy way’, thus this way the Seal of the Last of the Prophets is not broken, because the prophethood of Muhammad (may Peace Be Upon Him) remained with Muhammad.” (Mirza Qadiani in Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, Roohani Khazain vol.18, p.212)

 

 

“Blessed is he who has recognized me. Of all the paths to God I am the Last Path, and of all his Lights, I am the last Light. Unfortunate is he who forsakes me, because without me all is darkness”. (Kashti-e-Nooh, Roohani Khazain, vol.19, p.61)

 

“I am the only one selected in this Ummah to get the name of ‘Prophet ‘. No one else deserved this name…. and it was bound to happen… so that as mentioned in the Sahih Hadith that ‘there will be only one such person’, that prophecy is fulfilled.” (Haqeeqatul Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol. 22 p.407)

“The Prophethood ended on our Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him). Therefore after Him there is no Prophet except who has been illuminated by His Light and who has been made His inheritor by God. Know that Finality was given to Muhammad (may Peace Be Upon Him) since the Beginning; and then given to him (i.e. Mirza) who was taught by His Spirit and made His shadow. Thus blessed is the one who taught and blessed is the one who learned (i.e. Mirza). Thus FINALITY was destined for the SIXTH MILLENEUM, which is the sixth day in the days of God…… Thus the Promised Messiah was born in the SIXTH Millennium.” (Zamima Khutba Ilhamiah, Roohani Khazain vol. 16 p. 310)

Mirza Basheer Qadiani s/o Mirza Qadiani writes:

“Thus only one person got the status of Prophethood in the Ummah of Muhammad….except for the Promised Messiah (Mirza) no one followed Holy Prophet to such perfection to be called the Shadow of Holy Prophet. Therefore only Promised Messiah was chosen to be called the Prophet.” (Kalimat Al-Fasl, Review of Religions, Qadian, p.116, No.3, vol. 14)

 

Official Qadiani Magazine wrote:

“These quotations prove that except for the Promised Messiah no one else can be a Prophet…After Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) only one Prophet was necessary and the coming of too many Prophets would have hindered the Wisdom and Schemes of God.” (Tasheed-ul-azhan, Qadian, No.8, vol.12, p.11 dated August 1917)


 

The Quranic “Seal of the Prophets” Defies Hazrat Mirza’s Claims

Despite all Hazrat Mirza’s claims, most orthodox Muslim scholars have found his claims to be in conflict with:

Seal of the Prophets

Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but He is the Messenger of God and the Seal of the Prophets.  (Qur’an 33:40)


Disclaimer (on Interpretation): Beseech God, and let your prayerful attitude and a clean heart guide you to see the meanings in God’s words.

The word “Seal” (kha’tam in Arabic), in the verse above, has been interpreted over the centuries to mean the: “Last”, “Final”, “Seal” (as in a stamp sealing closed a document), “Seal” (as in seal of authority, officiating a document), and a few other meanings along similar lines of interpretation. Baha’is don’t object to these possible meanings, and readily believe in the more common interpretation of : (Seal meaning Last), as Muhammad (PBUH) is repeatedly referred to in the Baha’i Writings.
______________________________________________________________________________________
We provide here 3 other translations of the same verse to eliminate any doubts of its Arabic origins:
Quran 33:40
YUSUFALI: Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.
PICKTHAL: Muhammad is not the father of any man among you, but he is the messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets; and Allah is ever Aware of all things.
SHAKIR: Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Last of the prophets; and Allah is cognizant of all things.

***Despite all of Hazrat Mirza’s presentation, the Islamic Ummah has never accepted his claims as a Prophet of |Allah nor the concept that there could be any Prophet after the Prophet Muhammad. This point was a main cause for branding him (and his cult) blasphemous.

Mirza Qadiani Flays Islam

Mirza Qadiani claims THE PRE-MIRZA ISLAM IS A ‘DEAD RELIGION’

“Probably in the year 1906, at the proposal of Khwaja Kamaluddin, Moulvi Muhammad Ali entered into an agreement with the Editor of Akhbar-e-Watan to the effect that the Review of Religions would publish no articles about the (Qadiani) sect; it would only publish general articles on Islam and the Editor of the Watan would propagate in his paper for the assistance of the Journal, Review of Religions. The promised Masih disapproved this proposal and it was strongly opposed by the Jamaat also. Hazrat Sahib said:

‘Will you present dead Islam before the world by excluding me?” (Zikr-e-Habib by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Qadiani page 146, First Edition)

 

“We believe that a religion which does not have the continuity of Prophethood (as in Islam) is a dead religion. We call the religions of the Jews, the Christians and the Hindus dead only because now there are no prophets in them. If this were the position in Islam too, we would be no more than mere storytellers. Why do we regard it superior to other religions? It must have some distinction”. (Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol. 10, page 127)

 

 

MIRZA DECLARES ISLAM AS THE ACCURSED, SATANIC AND CONTEMPTIBLE RELIGION

“That religion is no religion and that prophet is no prophet by following whom a man does not come so close to God as to be honored with divine conversation. That religion is ACCURSED and CONTEMPTIBLE which teaches that human progress depends only on a few narrated anecdotes (i.e. stories in Holy Quran and the Shari’at-e-Muhammadia which is narrated from the Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) – Compiler) and that the ‘WAHI’ has lagged behind instead of going ahead……hence such a religion deserves to be called SATANIC rather than divine religion.” (Zamima Braheen-e-Qadianism, Part V, Roohani Khazain, Vol. 21, p. 306)

 

“How absurd and false it is to believe that after the Holy Prophet (may Peace Be Upon Him) the door of the divine ‘wahi’ has been closed for ever and there is no hope of it in the future till the Day of Resurrection – just worship the stories. Can a religion having no direct trace of Almighty Allah be called a religion? . . . . . I say, by Almighty God, that in this age there is no one more fed up than myself with such a religion. I name such a religion as Satanic religion and not Rehmani (divine) and I believe that such religion guides towards Hell and keeps one blind in life and till death.” (Zamima Braheen-e-Qadianism, Part V, Roohani Khazain, Vol.21, p354)

***ABROGATION OF JIHAD (164 verses) by Mirza Qadiani

Mirza Qadiani has always claimed that he was not a Prophet who brought new laws like the Prophet Muhammad, but one who came to refresh the interpretation of the Quran. (Either Mirza Qadiani or his followers attempted to mitigate Mirza’s claims by making Mirza’s claims of Prophet hood as subservient to that of the Prophet Muhammad’s because evidence from Mirza’s own writings indicate he himself does not acknowledge any subservience but equality or even superiority to Prophet Muhammad. But in his book, “Haqiqat-ul Wahy” written 10 years before his death, Mirza seemed to be just a touch softer with his claims perhaps realising the animosity and rejections he has raised among orthodox Muslims.)   Even today, most Ahmadis from the “Ahmadiyya Muslim Community” sect would be most offended if anyone would suggest that Mirza Qadiani “abrogated the Quran.” Yet by Mirza Qadiani’s own writings it cannot be denied that he did abrogate JIHAD.

“From my early age till now when I am 65 years of age, I have been engaged , with my pen and tongue, in an important task to turn the hearts of Muslims towards the true love & Goodwill & sympathy for the British Government and to obliterate the idea of Jihad from the hearts of stupid (Muslims.)”(Kitab-ul-Bariyah, Roohani Khazain vol. 13 p.350)

” . . for the sake of British Government, I have published & distributed 50,000 leaflets in this country (India) other Islamic countries(against jihad). . . . the result is that hundreds of thousands of people have given up their filthy ideas about Jihad.” (Roohani Khazain vol. 15 p.114)

From today human Jihad which is done by sword, is being ABROGATED by order of God (Allah.)From now on, anyone who lifts a sword on a Kafir and calls himself a Ghazi, he is disobeying that Messenger (may Peace Be Upon Him), who had informed 1300 years ago that after the coming of Promised Messiah all Jihads with sword will end. thus now after my arrival THERE IS NO JEHAD WITH SWORD. From our side we have raised the flag of Peace and Friendliness.” (Collection of Advertisement p.295, vol.3)
(Perhaps this explains why Ahmadis (in Britain) have developed such skills with verbal and script Jihad.)

(If 164 Quranic Verses are removed from the Quran, it will no longer be the same Quran that Muslims use today. Do the Qadianis use a different Quran?)

MIRZA DECLARES ALL THOSE MUSLIMS WHO DO NOT ACCEPT HIM AS A PROPHET ARE KAFIR

From his book Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi he writes:

“Question: Huzoor-e-aali has mentioned in thousands of places that it is not at all right to call KAFIR a Kalima-go (one who recites a Kalima) and an Ahle-Qibla. It is quite obvious that except those Momineen who become Kafir by rejecting you, just by not accepting you, no one becomes a Kafir. But you write to Abdul Hakeem Khan that anyone who has received my message and he has not accepted me, he is not Muslim. There is contradiction between this statement and the statements in previous books. Earlier in Tiryaq-ul-Quloob etc. you had mentioned that no one becomes Kafir by not accepting you and now you are writing that by rejecting me he becomes a Kafir. Answer: This is strange that you consider the person who rejects me and the person who calls me Kafir as two different persons, whereas in the eyes of God he is the same type; because he who does not accept me is because he considers me a fabricator…. apart from this, he who does not accept me, he does not believe in God and His Prophet as well, because there is God92s and his Prophet’s prophecy regarding me” (Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.167)

“Except for the CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTE, whose hearts have been sealed by God (Allah), everyone else believes in me and has accepted me (as Prophet).” (Aina-e-Kamalat-e-Qadianism, Roohani Khazain vol.5 p.547)

“God has revealed to me that anyone to whom my message has reached and he has not accepted me (as Prophet), he is not a Muslim.” (Letter of Mirza to Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan Patialvi)

“I have God’s inspiration that he who does not follow you (as Prophet) and will not enter your Ba’ith (House) and remain your opponent, he is disobedient of God (Allah) and His Prophet (Mirza), Hellish.”(Advertisement in M’ayaar-ul-Akhyar by Mirza Qadiani p.8)

“Thus remember as God has informed me, it is forbidden and absolutely forbidden to pray behind any disbeliever (of Mirza Qadiani) and hesitant; but is should be that your imam should be one of you (Ahmadi).” (Arbaeen No 3, Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.417 footnote) [3]

Epilogue

As a result of the persistent inaccurate protrayal of lthe Ahamdi sect and the personality of the founder of the Ahmadiyya sect, Mirza Ghulam Mirza, aka Mirza Qadiani, it was necessary to labourishly quote from Mirza Qadiani’s own writings to the point of boorishness. But any other quotations would never be accepted by the Ahmadis and any analysis would claimed to be out of context or biased. So with all references attached, anyone can look things up to their own satisfaction.

 

 

 

REFERENCES:

[1] Extracts from Ahmadi text: http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=278067706900&topic=14455&post=88992
[2] Syed Rashid Ali’s analysis: http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/qadiani_claims.htm
[3] Mirza Qadiani’s claims: http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/qadiani_claims.htm

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES:

[A1] “It is our obligation that we do not consider non-Ahmadis as Muslims and do not pray behind them, – http://www.allaahuakbar.net/qadianism/all_muslims_are_infedils.htm
[A2] Finality of Prophethood:http://www.janathimessage.co.uk/Literature/beliefs%20of%20ahle%20sunnah/BeliefsofQadianies.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: