Multiculturalism: A Moral Intoxicant:& Anti-Western Culture
Multiculturalism is a moral intoxicant. It plays on the emotion of superior virtues and is blighted with misguided “good intentions.”
Multiculturalism is basically an ideology that is Anti-Western Civilisation.
If promoted and adopted will undermine the National Security of Western Nations. It must be terminated henceforth.
- The Introduction of Multiculturalism to Europe by Charles De Gaulle
- Euro Arab Dialogue (EAD)
- Bat Ye’or’s Views on Islamisation of Europe: Eurobia
- Flemming Rose-Danish journalist
- Multiculturalism was essential for the Islamisation of Europe
- Holland, Denmark & Britain
- The Muslim Council of Great Britain (MCB)
- Australia: The Right to Leave
- America & Multi culture
- Consequences of Intrusion and Dominance of an Alien Culture
- What could be the possible consequences of Charles De Gaulle’s delusions of grandeur for the return of the Glory of France’s lost world prominence…
What is MULTICULTURALISM? Surprisingly and probably unappreciated by many people, the word “multiculturalism” was first introduced around 1990.
The word “multiculturalism” was really a code, an euphemism, for the word, “multi-racial.” Obsessed with “political correctness” the word “multicultural” was preferred as it removed the connotations of race or skin colour. However, this has distorted and misled the public perception in a way it was not intended to do.
The Introduction of Multiculturalism to Europe by Charles De Gaulle
Euro Arab Dialogue (EAD)
Bat Ye’or’s Views on Islamisation of Europe: Eurobia
Flemming Rose-Danish journalist
Multiculturalism was essential for the Islamisation of Europe
Holland, Denmark & Britain
The Muslim Council of Great Britain (MCB)
By STEVE DOUGHTY
Last updated at 10:25 AM on 29th June 2009
At least 85 Islamic Sharia Courts are operating in Britain, a study claimed yesterday. The astonishing figure is 17 times higher than previously accepted. The tribunals, working mainly from mosques, settle financial and family disputes according to religious principles. They lay down judgements which can be given full legal status if approved in the national law courts. [5a]
|Qur’an:2:216||“Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims), though you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not.” [Another translation reads:] “Warfare is ordained for you.”|
Australia: The Right to Leave
Our Country – YOU Have the Right – the Right to Leave !
We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, And we really don’t care how you did things where you came from.
This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this.
But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our National Motto, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom,
“THE RIGHT TO LEAVE”
If you aren’t happy here then off! We didn’t force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted. Pretty easy really, when you think about it. 
This Australian, no nonsense approach to their way of life says it all. It in no way accommodates “multiculturalism” or “secularism” as envisaged by the liberals. Pragmatic Australians have rejected “multiculturalism” and “secularism” if it threatens their way of life or their culture, and that is an example for all the other nations of the world.
THE MENACE OF MULTICULTURALISM (IN AUSTRALIA)
Multiculturalism is an unsound political theory, advocated by liberals, academics, media personnel, social theorists, government officials, Politicians (and do-gooders.)
It is a deliberate policy to actively maintain, support and build foreign cultures in Australia, to the detriment of the Australian identity, culture and way of life.
Instead of allowing immigrants, and their native-born offspring, to naturally assimilate into the Australian culture, governments are knowingly creating bases of foreign culture in this country. These deliberately divisive policies are carried out in two areas.
First, through the multicultural policies themselves, whereby foreign cultures are sustained and encouraged. Large sums of money are granted to “ethnic” organisations, which boosts the abilities of such organisations to service and perpetuate their “ethnic culture.” In schools, multicultural policies are actively pursued, whereby children are encouraged to identify with their “ethnicity,” rather than to become “fully” Australian. Many, if not all, aspects of public life are touched in a myriad of ways to official multicultural policies, all of which actually encourage a “them and us” attitude between “new Australians” and “old Australians.”
Secondly, immigration policies are based upon continuing mass immigration, which gives foreign cultures in Australia the ability to self-sustain their separate development.
These deliberately divisive policies are turning Australians against each other, and are creating a country populated by a collection of separate communities, instead of a nation populated by a nationally unified society.
“Multicultural Australia has thus become a breeding ground for a whole range of “micro-nations,” each with their own political and cultural agendas. Indeed, Geoffrey Blainey has warned that “multiculturalism…..is a new from of colonialism, in which we are the colony of every nation on earth.” As Australia struggles to encompass the many little Chinas, little Japans, little Italys, and little Croatias, (little Indonesias, little Pakistans) all determined to preserve their own national, cultural and ethnic peculiarities (including not only “lovely” dancing and foods, but sometimes strange, if not barbaric, customs; as well as some extremely strong hatreds (like Jihadism,)) it is very easy to see the disunity created among these ethnic communities; as well as between them and those who see themselves as “Australian,” foremost loyal to Australia. 
“Today we see forces that are determined to undermine national identity, and national security, and national sovereignty with skill and determination even using national Constitutions to their advantage. Unfortunately so many are guilty of culpable complacency to the corrosive imperatives of “multiculturalism” & “political correctness” in the misguided perception that it is democratic, liberal, and Christian to hold such concepts. But in reality, “multiculturalism” is really a form of mono-cultural animus directed against the dominant (resident) culture. Sameul Huntingdon, a Harvard political scientist, notes:
“…multiculturalism is “anti-European civilisation ….It is basically an anti-Western ideology.” The multicultural advocates claim to be fostering a progressive cultural cosmopolitanism distinguished by superior sensitivity to the downtrodden and dispossessed. In fact, they encourage an orgy of self-flagellating liberal guilt as impotent as it is insatiable. The “sensitivity” of the multicultural advocates is an index not of moral refinement but of moral vacuousness. As the French essayist Pascal Bruckner observed, “An overblown conscience is an empty conscience.”
“Compassion ceases if there is nothing but compassion, and revulsion turns to insensitivity. Our “soft pity,” as Stefan Zweig calls it, is stimulated, because guilt is a convenient substitute for action where action is impossible. Without the power to do anything, sensitivity becomes our main aim. The aim is not so much to do anything, as to be judged. Salvation lies in the verdict that declares us to be wrong.”
Multiculturalism is a moral intoxicant; its thrill centres around the emotion of superior virtue; its hangover subsists on a diet of nascences and blighted “good intentions.”
Wherever the imperatives of multiculturalism have touched the curriculum, they have left broad swaths of anti-Western attitudes competing for attention with quite astonishing historical blindness.
But multiculturalism is not only an academic phenomenon. The attitudes it fosters have profound social as well as intellectual consequences. One consequence has been a sharp rise in the phenomenon of immigration without- or with only minutiae-assimilation: a dangerous demographic trend that threatens American identity in the most basic way.
These various agents of dissolution are also elements in a wider culture war: the contest to define how we live and what counts as the good in the good life. Anti-Americanism occupies such a prominent place on the agenda of the culture wars precisely because the traditional values of American identity – articulated by the Founders and grounded in a commitment to individual liberty and public virtue – are deeply at odds with the radical, de-civilising tenets of the “multicultural” enterprise.” 
I could not have said it any better.
Multi culture is a moral intoxicant. It plays on the emotion of superior virtues and is blighted with misguided “good intentions.”
Multi culture is basically an ideology that is Anti-Western Civilisation.
Consequences of Intrusion and Dominance of an Alien Culture
What could be the possible consequences of Charles De Gaulle’s delusions of grandeur for the return of the Glory of France’s lost world prominence when he made overtures to the Arab world in November 27th, 1967. This was a move that must have seemed like an act of Allah in favour of his Muslim Arabs. This act opened the floodgates of Muslim immigration into Europe by peaceful means, floodgates that had been shored up from previous incursions of Islamic rule. The Ottoman Empire that began in the 14th century rising to its peak in 1600 and dominating large swaths of southern Europe, but finally fading to obscurity in 1918. during that period of dominance, the Muslim culture was imposed upon the countries controlled by the Ottomans and its legacy can be observed today.
Today, the influx of Muslims from the Muslim world taking advantage of the need for labour after WW II in Europe, and the enticement of generous welfare benefits and secular laws has meant the creation of large ghettoes of Muslims in the major towns and cities of Europe. As these immigrants will vote as a solid block, the political voice of these immigrants has become deafening. These immigrants have taken advantage of every law or regulation or social liberty to their advantage. They have learned to exploit all the welfare amenities available, and used secularism to demand for mosques, Islamic schools, and other Islamic organizations taking advantage of every tax loophole available. Local politicians who want to exploit the immigrant vote will provide more and more privileges and liberties even to the detriment of the native inhabitants. Finally the generosity and patience of the native population has been exhausted and resentment is building up a head of steam.
Immigrants of all hues even if they do not assimilate easily or smoothly, attempt to live harmoniously and amiably with the native population. But with Islam, assimilation is impossible by the very nature of their ideologies. For Allah said:
Qur’an 20:8 “Allah! There is no Ilah (God) save Him (Allah). His are the most beautiful Names. To Him belong the most beautiful attributes.”
Qur’an 20:14 “Verily, I am Allah. No Ilah (God) may be worshipped but I. So serve you Me, and perform regular prostration prayer for My praise. Verily the Hour is coming. I am almost hiding it from Myself.”
Qur’an:9:5 “Fight and kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”
Qur’an:9:112 “The Believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, kill and are killed.”
Qur’an:9:29 “Fight those who do not believe (in Allah) until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”
Qur’an 5:51 “Believers, take not Jews and Christians for your friends. They are but friends and protectors to each other.”
Qur’an 5:72 “They (Christians) are surely infidels who blaspheme and say: ‘God is Christ, the Messiah, the son of Mary.’ But the Messiah only said: ‘O Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.'”
From the few verses quoted, and if these are accepted by any Muslim to be the authentic command of Allah, then compatibility or assimilation with any other community that rejects Allah as the only Ilah would be impossible. This is the reason, Muslims cannot assimilate into any non-Muslim community. This is not appreciated by most other communities or religions because it is so alien with their own concepts. The above verses should be a clear indication that Muslims can never integrate with a non-Muslim community because no one has the authority to challenge the word of Allah.
It is abundantly clear that compatibility or compromise between the European Christian culture and the orthodox Islamic culture is an impossibility. Only one side or the other will have to dominate. On the one hand it is inconceivable that Islam will be able to alter the commands of Allah in order to accommodate Christian/Judaic sentiments nor is it conceivable that Christians/Jews would be willing to submit to the will of Allah or be prepared to submit to Islam as Dhimmis.
In order to placate the Muslim mobs from further violence over their anger over the Danish cartoons of Mohammed, or over the wars in Iraq, or Afghanistan, or the conflicts in Palestine, the West has deplored the abuse of freedom of speech, or made patronising remarks with references to the wars, or made promises to solve the problems of the Middle East, or handling the Muslim riots and demonstrations with kid gloves and introducing laws against acts of encouragement of violence. But no matter what concessions or assurances the government offers, Muslims will always demand more. They will continue to demand until such time as the have Islamised the country they have occupied, such as the biggest and largest Mosque, towering over any other religious buildings in the area as a symbol of Islamic dominance, introducing the Sharia Law by stealth and by degrees, introducing Islamic schools, Islamic representation of all Government bodies, and institutions, and in effect until they have effective control of the country.
*Although the term “Arab” was referred to throughout this article, it was intended to be synonymous with “(Arab-Muslims)” because of Charles De Gaulle’s conspiracy with the Arab Muslims, with reference to the immigration from the Maghreb countries to South Western Europe, it took for granted the subsequent immigration of all Muslims, from other parts of the world including African countries as well as Pakistan and Bangladesh although not specifically named in the text. Immigration from Pakistan and Bangladesh was similar to the Arab immigration, but were focused immigration into Great Britain. I was taken for granted that Arabs synonymous with Islam meant all Muslims in this article.
“Multiculturalism is used as the Trojan Horse for Islamic domination of all infidel cultures.” (AbdulMuhd)
Multiculturalism: the Nihilistic Trojan Horse
ni⋅hil⋅ism [nahy-uh-liz-uhm, nee-] –noun 1. total rejection of established laws and institutions.
2. anarchy, terrorism, or other revolutionary activity.
3. total and absolute destructiveness, esp. toward the world at large and including oneself: the power-mad nihilism that marked Hitler’s last years.
4. Philosophy. a. an extreme form of skepticism: the denial of all real existence or the possibility of an objective basis for truth.
b. nothingness or nonexistence.
“We love death. The US loves life. That is the difference between us two.” Osama Bin Laden
Multiculturalism is the lie that all cultures are equal. Or maybe some believe they just should be treated equally. Regardless, to embrace the lie that cultures that celebrate death are equal to cultures that celebrate life is to reject objective truth. The folly of this is that no matter how irrational a culture might be, very few if any people from a non-western culture would offer the same deference. To believe in multiculuralism literally is to reject any notion of good and evil or right and wrong, because nearly everything that anyone regards as immoral or wrong is permissable in one culture or another. Check out my blog on the Kombai tribe for a few examples:
So, logically speaking (I understand it’s asking a lot for most people who try to push multiculturalism to think logically) multiculturalism is nihilism. It is not merely nihilistic, it is nihilism at its very core.
Now come the concessions. Yes, there is some value in cultural customs from across the world, and we can learn things from other cultures. But there are objective concepts such as right and wrong, good and evil. And the cultures that identify and emphasize those are the most productive and advanced for a reason. To reject the moral superiority of western cultures (though they are far from perfect) is to reject civilization and modernity as we know it. Finally, we must separate the individuals from their culture. To say that one civilization’s culture is better than another’s is not to degrade the individuals in an inferior culture, nor does it somehow make them less human. But this should be self evident.
 Multicultural bunk: http://www.multiculturalbunk.com/
 Charles De Gaulle and EuroArab Dialogue: http://www.meforum.org/696/eurabia-europes-future
 Bat Ye’or views on Eurabia: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/840
 Multiculturalism & the Islamisation of Europe: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/02/text-bat-yeor-from-europe-to-eurabia.html
[4a]* Stop Islamisation Of Europe, SIOE/`(SIAD): http://sioe.wordpress.com/about/
[4b] SIOE (SIAD): http://siad.wordpress.com/2007/03/04/demonstration-sep-11th/
 Multiculturalism in Holland, Denmark&Britain: http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=8815
[5a] 85 Sharia Courts in Britain by 29th June, 2009: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196165/Britain-85-sharia-courts-The-astonishing-spread-Islamic-justice-closed-doors.html
 Sharia Law in Britain: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2957428/Sharia-law-courts-operating-in-Britain.html
 No Sympathy for British Dead in Afghanistan&Iraq: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6927633/Muslim-cleric-Anjem-Choudary-vows-to-continue-Wootton-Bassett-march.html
 Australia’s – “The right to leave.”http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/16311.htm
 The Menace of Multiculturalism (Australia): http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/pc/multi3.htm#top
 Multiculturalism and America, Roger Kimball: http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Institutionalizing-our-demise–America-vs–multiculturalism-1472