Norway is critical of “Critics of Multiculturalism, Immigration and Islam.”
The Anders Breivik’s murderous rampage has caused some of us to look deeper into the causes of his sudden wild outburst of anger and frustrations. Breivik was not and is not insane. His deeds were cool and calculated and all explained in his manifesto. So let us attempt to look at the fundamental causes of his frustrations.
No doubt, Breivik observed the sudden influx of immigrants and noticed that many of these immigrants did not integrate or were assimilated into Norwegian society, but the Government policy was to continue encouraging foreign immigration, and promote the concept of “multiculturalism” and “appease the dissatisfied new immigrants even at the expense of the native inhabitants” in particular, the angry unassimilating Muslim community. It was government policy to suppress any anti-multiculturalism or anti-Islam sentiments throughout the nation. It was the rallying call of the Labour Party that also had the full support and encouragement of the, “Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions, the LO.” Thus the Labour Party in power, combined with the backing of the LO, (Labour Trade Union members) formed a powerful national unit that had tremendous clout over political and national policies.
The conviction that “multiculturalism and free immigration (free of racial or religious prejudices)” was the way to establish an integrated and peaceful Norway and Europe, it became their rallying call. The way multiculturalism was preached became like a religious call to battle. Everyone in Norway believed that it was the right and moral way for Norway and the world. So much so that the powerful national leader of the LO, Roar Flåthen, promised that the labour unions will fight relentlessly against racism and intolerance throughout society and in the workplace. “We want a Multicultural society. This is enriching,” he told the crowd.
Sections of LO will from 2012 on donate half a million kroner every year to “the Norwegian Centre against Racism” to combat right-wing extremism. “To be against the Multicultural society, as Breivik says, is nothing other than what Hitler espoused,” says Leif Sande, who represents one of LO’s subgroups.
In Norway, there seemed to be hardly any open opposition to the stance of the Labour Party policy, for even Erna Solberg, leader of the Conservative Party of Norway, also wants stronger action to combat “hate.” Erna Solberg has even called for sterner measures to combat hate, racism, and extremism in all sectors of society including the police, schools, and public establishments. Erna Solberg (leader of Conservative Party, Norway) had for years encouraged greater mass immigration and praised the richness of the diversity of cultures such immigration brought. She even called for the establishment of Sharia Councils to be formed and recognized by the government so that Muslims could use their own laws to settle Islamic disputes. So the Labour Unions, the Labour Party, the Conservative Party, the majority of Norwegians including the media and the Academic intellectuals where all in favour of multiculturalism, and unrestricted immigration and freedom of religion. There was very little room for dissent in Norway.
In fact, so paranoid were/are the Norwegians that the “Norwegian Centre against Racism” was specifically set up to combat and suppress right-wing extremism, with direct annual state support the centre spends millions, “for mapping international networks opposed to multiculturalism.” This illustrates the extremism of multiculturalism ethic among their followers. Kari Helene Partapuoli, the head of The Norwegian Centre Against Racism, even warned against subconscious racism that lies within all of us. It seemed as though she was admitting that racism was/is a primitive fear instinct that lies within all humans. She is right of course. This Centre have of course appointed expert advisors like, “Shoaib Sultan,” the former General Secretary at the Islamic Council of Norway, to keep Norwegians advised of how to detect and deal with the extremists who oppose mass immigration into Norway. In fact Muslim advisors to politicians, and most public bodies had created a shortage of Norwegian speaking Islamists who were sufficiently knowledgeable of Islam and the Norwegian cultural norms to be able to negotiate skillfully through the delicately balancing act and maneuver the Muslims to advantage. This places the control buttons of anti-racism and multiculturalism into the hands of Muslims. Many nations are guilty of this error. 
The above examples of Norwegian paranoia of right wing criticisms of their concepts of racism, multiculturalism, has led them into a state of “left wing extremism.” It is this “left wing extremism” that has been the trigger for “right wing extremism” manifested by Anders Breivik, a natural reactive force born out of suppressed and persecuted authoritarianism.
It is strange that when an Anglo Saxon (Christian) nation reacts in a totalitarian autocratic way, controlling the freedom of speech, and suppressing all dissensions against multiculturalism, racism, or Islam, even monitoring internet channels, it is overlook and not condemned. Yet when China monitors anti-Sino propaganda from America, or throws a treasonous rebel in prison, the whole western world cries “foul.” Although the totalitarianism practiced is comparable in both cases. There seems to be a double standard being applied. This hypocrisy is so apparent.
What is more appalling is that Norway (viewed as a peaceful and neutral nation) was forced to take a totalitarian dictatorial censorship stance in order to protect a totally, “aggressive totalitarian and immiscible ideology, Islam.” Norway could not be more misinformed and misled by some very ignorant and unlearned political and academic leaders about the true ideology of (militant) Islam. Yet the rest of Europe/world stood by without any comments whatsoever. Are there no introspective Norwegians who have the intelligence to see the folly of their thinking? Breivik was one, who became so frustrated and convinced that the only way to wake Norway up was to act in the most bizarre way possible to draw attention to the seriousness of the problem, knowing full well that the only thanks he would have received would have been, death, a death sentence, life imprisonment, or locked up in a mental institution. He was prepared to pay that price for the sake of Norway and Europe.
“Erna Solberg (leader of Conservative Party, Norway) had for years encouraged greater mass immigration and praised the richness of the diversity of cultures such immigration brought.” That is one of the greatest misinformation’s anyone could introduce to the public especially in her position.
Some cultures like Islam are immiscible with the Western Judeo-Christian culture. And the differences are so fundamental and basic that anyone should be able to understand that these two cultures are incompatible. Let me quote just one or two examples from the Islamic Holy Book that cannot be refuted:
Qur’an 20:14 “Verily, I am Allah. No Ilah (God) may be worshiped but I. So serve you Me, and perform regular prostration prayer for My praise. Verily the Hour is coming. I am almost hiding it from Myself.”
This means that Muslims will never accept any other god nor anyone who worships another god for they will be infidels. Nor will they accept any other judicial or civil authority except Islam and the Sharia Law, Allah’s Laws.
Qur’an 78:37 “None shall have power to argue with the Lord (Allah), none can converse with Him or address Him.”
So the Qur’an that contains the literal word of Allah can never be challenged.
Islamic concept of sex and women differ from Christian values:
Qur’an 33:51 “You may have whomever you desire; there is no blame.”
Qur’an 66:1 “O Prophet! Why forbid yourself that which Allah has made lawful to you? You seek to please your consorts.”
Qur’an 4:23 “Prohibited to you are: your mothers, daughters, sisters…. Also (prohibited are) women already married, except slaves who are captives, (or infidel women whom you have subdued/captured.)”
Now you can understand the cause of sex crimes in your country:
According to a Norwegian police report released in June (2011), every single solved case of assault-rape in the country in 2010 had been committed by a Muslim immigrant.
Out of a total of 186 rape cases in 2010, 86 were assault-rapes — rape perpetrated with physical force and violence. In 83 of the assault-rapes, the victims could identify the perpetrators. In all 83 cases, the perpetrators were described as having “non-western appearance” — an euphemism for Muslim immigrants from Africa, the Middle East, or Asia.
The report was cited by a Norwegian television station that interviewed a victim who said her rapist told her his religion permits him to rape her. (Note: the translation of the Norwegian TV report below does not make a distinction between “assault rape” and other forms of rape, and appears to confuse the statistics for 2010 with those for 2006-2010.)
The Mufti of Australia, Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali, …recently sparked an international stir by pronouncing that women who do not veil themselves, and allow themselves to be “uncovered meat,” are at fault if they are raped.
This is nothing new, of course, and it is somewhat mysterious why the Sheikh’s comments have caused any shock at all, since his view is legitimized by various Islamic texts and numerous social and legal Islamic structures. And that is why back in September 2004 in Denmark, al-Hilali’s Australian counterpart, the Mufti Shahid Mehdi, declared exactly the same thing, stating that unveiled women are “asking for rape.”
All of this, in turn, explains the skyrocketing epidemic of Muslim rape in non-Islamic countries. Muslim newcomers are significantly overrepresented among convicted rapists and rape suspects throughout European nations such as Sweden, Norway, and Denmark.
No wonder why many Muslim rapists openly admit their actions and justify them smugly with casual references to their religious and cultural beliefs. This horrifying phenomenon was on display in a court trial in Australia last year, in which a Muslim rapist, going by the name ”MSK”, taunted his sobbing 14-year-old victim and proudly professed the legitimacy of his sexual assaults on young girls by explaining that his victims were not veiled — as the Islamic religion mandates women to be.
And is this the alien culture that will “enrich” the host country? It shows the “total ignorance” of Erna Solberg and many others like her across Europe of the Islamic culture. If the Sharia Laws are provided, most of these rape offenders would be set free as Sharia Law demands that the victim must be able to produce 4 Male witnesses to the crime of rape. There are of course many other examples of such incompatibility of the cultures. 
 Monitoring Islam Critics in Norway: