Libertarianism,Secularism,Multiculturalism,Human Rights will Destroy Western Civilisation

Authors

Libertarianism, Secularism, Multiculturalism, Human Rights are Destroying Western Civilisation

In the false belief that we are emancipating our stagnant repressive, racist, bigoted civilisation from old fashioned and obsolete values, we are speeding headlong into the oblivion of the Western civilisation with very poorly thought out and tested concepts of equality for all man. Let us first look at a present day case to illustrate how confused we are about our values and definitions.

Anjem Choudary bail restrictions relaxed by judge

Court hears that bail terms should allow Muslim extremist ‘religious freedom’

One of Britain’s most notorious hate clerics has been given permission to begin preaching on the streets again after a judge ruled he must be allowed “religious freedom”.

Anjem Choudary was arrested on terror charges along with six others at the end of September.

The men are alleged to have been members of an organisation banned under the Terrorism Act and are said to have encouraged terrorism.

Howard Riddle, the chief magistrate and senior district judge, said a restriction on the men taking part in Muslim stalls to preach Islam and share religious material – known as Da’wah stalls – will end on December 18.

Mr Riddle said police allege the Da’wah stalls have been “misused to spread extremist literature”.

“The Da’wah stalls are a significant part of the current investigation,” the senior district judge said.

“However it is accepted that the Da’wah stall has an ostensible purpose to spread the word of Islam and to proselytise.

“Religious freedom is of considerable significance.”

He added: “The matters that have tipped the balance on extending such a condition beyond mid-December are the lack of any specific evidence provided to me that any of these individuals have misused the Da’wah stall and most importantly the fact they are suspects and have not been charged.”

The bail condition on not taking part in the stalls was not renewed by Mr Riddle but other restrictions on the suspects – including a ban on foreign travel and on associating with each other – will remain in force.

The court heard 10 police officers are sifting through material seized in a series of raids.

An eighth man, Siddartha Dhar, 31, was also arrested but he has since fled the country with his wife and four children.

None of the seven remaining men was present at the brief hearing at Westminster magistrates’ court.

Mr Riddle said the men – Shakil Chapra, Choudary and his brother Yazandi, Dhar, Abdul Muhid, Mohammed Rahman, Mohammed Shamsuddin and Anthony Small – would remain on bail until January 27.

The men are all alleged to be senior members of al-Muhajiroun, an extreme radical Islamist organisation that openly supported al-Qaeda, sent men out to fight in Syria and was said to have influenced the murderers of Drummer Lee Rigby.

Under original bail conditions, as well as surrendering their driving licences and travel documents, the men, apart from the Choudary brothers, were not permitted to associate with their co-defendants.

Mr Choudary, of Walthamstow, east London, said: “I do not accept concepts like religious freedom or freedom of expression, I believe in worshipping God.

“If the authorities are not going to oppress us further by, in their view, relaxing certain conditions then that is good news.

“But the conditions that are in force are ridiculous, such as not being allowed to speak to each other. We’ve known each other for 20 years.”

Mr Choudary has previously said he believed his arrest had been “politically motivated”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11246855/Anjem-Choudary-bail-restrictions-relaxed-by-judge.html

All of us are aware that because of 9/11, 7/7, Iraq war, war in Afghanistan, Syria and ISIL, the beheadings, the return of the Jihadis, the whole of Britain is nervous and on edge. So we round up on people like Anjem Choudary and others to try them in court for “promoting hatred and violence.” Anyone who has studied Anjem Choudary’s speeches in public will observe that he is very precise and careful with his proselytising of Islam. It is all in strict accordance of Islamic teachings and within the parameters of the Quran and the Ahadith. As a lawyer, he is careful and will not ad lib his own interpretations, but that of the Quranic verses. He is thus preaching orthodox Islam and cannot be considered preaching outside of Islam. Thus if he should be prosecuted for this the courts would be violating the observation of “secularism” and “violating his human rights.” The courts had no option but to permit Anjem Choudary to continue practicing his “freedom of religion.” The same applied to another preacher Abu Hamza, and others, where the courts were helpless to prosecute them on any acts of spreading hatred and terrorism.

The Quran: Doctrine of Exclusion and Intolerance

Yet it is abundantly clear that a reading of the Quran confirms that it is the source of Islamic “exclusion and intolerance,” and the source and inspiration of all Islamic Jihadist activity and hatred. Yet no one dares to condemn the Quran, the Holy Book of Islam, because “secularism and multiculturalism” has shielded the Quran. Besides, anyone who would dare to denigrate the Quran will be condemned by 1.4 billion Muslims worldwide and a death fatwa will be placed on his head. There is no tolerance in Islam for anyone who speaks against or about Islam.

As a result, all verses of hatred and violence are sacred and protected by secularism, multiculturalism, political correctness and intimidation by Muslims. so the sources and fountains of hatred and violence are preserved by our conventions. Such verses as:

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule.  Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.  Muslims who do not join the fight are called ‘hypocrites’ and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing…

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)

Quran (2:216) – Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.”  Muhammad’s instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

Allah; there is no god but Allah, the Ever Living, the Eternal One. Neither slumber nor sleep overtakes Him. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. He is the Most Exalted, the Most Great.[The Holy Qur’an, Surah 2:255]

The above 5 verses are sufficient to show the extent of the exclusivity and intolerance of Islam, and to prove it is the source of Muslim hatred of non-Muslims, yet the hypocritical West tolerates the Quran and accepts it with Islam’s continual radicalisation of Muslims with silence and total political correctness from the West,  when in fact those doctrines should be put on trial and banished. The doctrine of Islam is one of an uncompromising, “Supremacist Totalitarian Theocracy” that can never be a part of secular, multicultural, libertarian, equal society, because Islam’s doctrines are in conflict and are opposed to such ideology.

Why has the West put their heads in the sand and tolerated this state of affairs without a murmur? It is similar to the Jews who were willingly ushered on to trucks and trains to their death and incineration without a murmur of protest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: