The Final and Only Solution to Islamic Jihad: Conclusion

Authors

Introduction

It has only been recently that I have noticed the increase of anger and intolerance of the West towards Islamic Jihad expressed openly. It cannot be said that the patience and tolerance of the West has not been well and sorely tested especially in recent years. Muslims have certainly pushed the West to the limits of tolerance and their patience has begun to run out. I will attempt to portray the situation as it currently stands from various sources.

Islamic terrorism will end. It is both unsustainable and an intolerable burden upon the civilized world. Ending it is a matter of obtaining sufficient political willpower and an educated electorate that will no longer put up with ineffectual Politically Correct politicians who continue to ignore, obfuscate or simply deny the need to eliminate such a monstrous drag on global progress.[1]

If it was possible to set aside terrorism-related loss of life ― and it most certainly is not ― the financial cost alone of combating it is absurd. [1]

The November 13, 2015 Paris massacre aroused so much anger world wide that it was practically counter-productive for Jihadist Islam. France was so angered that President François Hollande has used a highly-unusual address to both French parliaments to call on Russia and America to “unite our forces” in a coalition to destroy Isil, three days after Islamists killed 129 in France’s worst ever terror attacks.

Never has the loss of 129 lives raised so much anger throughout the world.

PS: Even China has expressed their willingness to fight ISIL alongside Russia in Syria.

The financial burdens to all Western nations to provide the extra security for their nations has become so great that it is starting to bleed even the strongest of nations. The financial burden to handle, process, feed, house, provide medical care, to police and process crimes particularly related to Muslims and their culture, schools, services to the hundreds of thousands of Islam refugees and economic migrants has become impossible to sustain.

Yet, The elite class, rootless, arrogant, cynically manipulative, has every intention of continuing to “fight” the war on terrorism without naming the enemy, without revealing his beliefs, without unmasking his intentions, without offending his accomplices, without expelling his fifth columnists, and without ever daring to win.[1]

It will end when the tipping point is reached.[1]

There is no place in the civilized world for the religion of Islam

Jihadis emulate Mohammad. They are not “militants,” “radicals,” “extremists,” or “hijackers” of Islam, but fundamentalists – those who adhere most strictly to the teachings of Mohammad.

Islam means submission to Allah by Moslems, and submission to Moslems by infidels – in other words all people must be slaves to their god, and this is whole-heartedly supported by the vast majority of Moslems.

Islam has been the bane of civilization for fourteen centuries as a backwards, violent culture of death and oppression.

The fanaticism of Islam runs deep due to their being force to pray to Allah five times a day, thus making their beliefs so deeply ingrained as to be next to impossible to overcome. Regardless of the hate, murder, and destruction committed in the name of Islam, it is always justified in their minds using the same justification Mohammad did for all of his crimes against humanity.

America, Europe, and the world have a choice; allow this religion of violent oppression that has greater mind-control than the blindest cult to continue to spread until they engulf the free world, or abolish it.  [2]

Comments

Drastic? Yes! Necessary? Without a doubt.

When the West was confronted with Nazism who were determined to rule Europe and the world, they had to fight to the death to defeat and destroy Nazism so that it would never rear its ugly head again.

When Europe and America was confronted with Soviet Communism, determined to spread its ideology throughout the world and dominate it, it was resisted until Soviet Communism imploded and destroyed itself, taking with it its original ideology.

When the West is confronted with Islam, an Absolute Totalitarian Supremacist Theocracy, whose whole ambitions is to rule the world for Allah, a cult more sinister dangerous than Nazism or Soviet Communism, the West is hesitant and undecided. Why? There seems to be lack of conviction, probably because the ideology of Islam is not fully understood due to ignorance of the subject by most of their leaders, political and religious, and swayed by the libertarians of today.

Another View

The Final Solution to Islamic terrorism and the Jihad

“You cannot coexist with people who want to kill you.”

Jihadis are not going to war because they are poor, but because of their religion and the teachings of Mohammad.

Jihad is the foundation of the religion of Mohammad the First Jihadi.

What is well known is that if you cannot name your enemy you cannot understand his motivations to defeat him.

The name of the enemy is Islam.

Step 2 – Crush the Jihad.  The only way to do this is to kill them. (Banish and Destroy Islam.)

Epilogue

People in the Middle East are not joining ISIS because they have no jobs, but because of the teachings of their Imams that the Jihad is a higher purpose for their lives.

Blaming terrorism on poverty is the greatest lie of the Obama administration. His claim that global warming is more dangerous than Islamic Jihad is a colossal fraud. If Islam cannot be destroyed then it must be contained, and allowing Moslems to immigrate into Europe and America, to colonize rather than assimilate, and spread their religion rather than adopt the culture and peaceful religion of their hosts is more than counterproductive – it is suicide. [2]

Comments

I reiterate:

The elite class, rootless, arrogant, cynically manipulative, has every intention of continuing to “fight” the war on terrorism without naming the enemy, without revealing his beliefs, without unmasking his intentions, without offending his accomplices, without expelling his fifth columnists, and without ever daring to win.

Up to today, non of our political or religious leaders has ever come out to declare that, “the enemy is Islam.” The closest they have come is to identify the enemy as ISIL (which of course complies with all the attribute declared in the Quran.) Until we are ready to identify the enemy and challenge him, we are all appeasers and hypocrites. We will never face down the enemy if we are not prepared to call a spade a spade.

 

Yet Another View of The Final Solution To Jihad

Retired Marine Lt. Col. James G. Zumwalt in an essay published by Family Security Matters when discussing the existence of Muslims wrote, “a rational world should recognize but one `final solution’ exists – their extinction.”

Zumwalt asserts

that wholesale annihilation of Muslim populations is strategically necessary and morally justifiable, because Muslim victims of terrorism are infected with the same “ideology” as their captors. (In other words, there is no such thing as a Moderate Islam.)

Theological heavyweight) Phil Robertson with application to Muslims: “In this case, you either have to convert them – which I think would be next to impossible … or kill them.”

Yes, Robertson was referring specifically to the much-dreaded and nearly omnipotent ISIS, but his core audience consists of people who have been convinced that all Muslims are, at best, latent Jihadists who seethe with unconsummated and irrepressible lust to slit the throats of all infidels.

ISIS “is doing to America [sic] journalists what every true follower of Mohammed wants to do to you and yours: subjugate or murder you,” shrills Gary Cass, who apparently regards himself as a pastor of some variety. “They believe they have been given a mandate by Allah [Satan] to dominate the world.”

Hollrah urges legislative action to criminalize the religion of Islam, coupled with the use of holographic propaganda to re-program Muslims imprisoned in concentration camps.

“Islam is not a religion, as we understand the term,” Hollrah pronounces with the unwarranted but invincible certitude of a confirmed bigot. Instead, he continues, it is a subversive movement devoted to the overthrow of the US government “by violence, if necessary.”

His proposed legislation would define Islam as “the agency of a hostile foreign power” constituting “a clear and present danger to the security of the United States,” and designate its followers as people “directed and controlled in the conspiratorial performance of their revolutionary services. Therefore, the organization of Islam shall be outlawed in the United States.”

Such “drastic measures” are justified, Hollrah maintains, because “we are dealing with religious fanatics whose only goal in life is to kill us all, and for no other reason than that we exist.” [2]

Discussion

The above clearly shows that for some, Islam has already pushed them to their limits. How soon will Islam alienate the rest of the world into action?

The Latest Views:

On December 2nd, 2015, Hilary Benn (Labour) delivered one of his finest speeches in Parliament to support the bombing of ISIL in Syria. This short extract applies equally to Islam is it does to ISIL:

We never have – and we never should – walk by on the other side of the road.

And we are here faced by fascists. Not just their calculated brutality, but their belief that they are superior to every single one of us in this chamber tonight, and all of the people that we represent. They hold us in contempt. They hold our values in contempt. They hold our belief in tolerance and decency in contempt. They hold our democracy, the means by which we will make our decision tonight, in contempt. And what we know about fascists is that they need to be defeated. And it is why, as we have heard tonight, socialists and trade unionists and others joined the International Brigade in the 1930s to fight against Franco. It’s why this entire House stood up against Hitler and Mussolini. It is why our party has always stood up against the denial of human rights and for justice. And my view, Mr Speaker, is that we must now confront this evil.

Is the world close to the tipping point regarding the toleration of Islam?

(1063)

Addendum

DUTCH POLITICIAN: ‘WE MUST CLOSE ALL MOSQUES & BAN ISLAM’

Dutch politician Machiel de Graaf with the PVV party, shocked the world with his recent address to the Dutch Parliament. In a time when prejudice against Islam is at all time high and millions of Muslim migrants are flooding into Western Europe, unrest is at an all time high in place like Greece, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands between migrants and natural born citizens.

In his address to the Dutch Parliament he gave some shocking statistics and made many points that people are having a difficult time denying the truths in.

Machiel de Graaf’s words were not only straight-forward and direct, which is an oddity in itself for a politician, but much of it is hard to dispute, even by people who support Islam.

Without Islam, the Netherlands would not be losing 7.2 billion per year on mass (Muslim) immigration.

Without Islam there would be no mosques in Netherlands and people would not be confronted every day by Islamic headscarves, “hate beards”, and minarets; A country without all the symbols of Islamic domination, wonderful. What a country Netherlands would be!

Without Islam, Jewish children would be able to go to school without protection and gays and lesbians would be safer on our streets.

Without Islam we would need fewer prisons and police.

He then went to talk about how there would be no integration subsidies, which are a great burden to their economy. There would be no mistreatment of animals and Dutch people would feel less inclined to flee their own country. With more and more Western European politicians making similar claims, Islam could soon be banned in many countries.

http://patriotcrier.com/dutch-politicia … an-islam/#

It’s Time to Ban Islam In America

Islam is a highly vile, misogynistic and supremacist institution that has no place in our constitutional republic. It violently contravenes the very essence of the Declaration of Independence while treading upon the Constitution.

So, why is this dung-heap tolerated among us?

Well, the answer to this question is very simple: Because so many have bought the liberal lie spewed by such loons as Mike Bloomberg and Chris Christie that Islam is a religion, and therefore constitutionally protected.

Nonsense!

Truth is: Islam is not a religion – but rather a political system that deems all women and non-Muslims subhuman. Yes, a political system that demands the US Constitution be replaced by Sharia law.

Think I’m engaging in hyperbole?

In a 1998 speech – CAIR’s founder Omar Ahmad stated the following: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”

Translation: Replace America’s rule of law (the Constitution) with Sharia.

Ahmad’s statement is a direct affront (not to mention violation) to Article 6 of the Constitution which states that “This Constitution … shall be the supreme Law of the land.”

Treading upon the Constitution? Yeah, I think so!

And by replacing our Constitution with an Islamic law that not only treats women as mere chattel – but that also denies every aspect of freedom to non-Muslims – clearly eviscerates the most sacred tenet found in the Declaration of Independence: “That all men are created equal…”

One need look no further than Iran to see the insidiousness of Sharia in action where women are stoned for wearing tight fitting clothing – while converts to Christianity are beheaded.

Again, Islam is not a religion and therefore is not deserving of First Amendment protections. Instead, it is a political system that demands the eradication of our Constitution and the sublime Judeo-Christian principles upon which our great nation was founded.

These demands are not only outrageous and manifestly dangerous – but are also clearly unlawful because of their treasonous shrill. (Just remember the above mentioned statement by CAIR’s founder.)

So, it is for these very reasons that I firmly and steadfastly stand behind the following statement: It’s time to ban Islam in America.

http://clashdaily.com/2013/10/speaking- … m-america/

Comments
 By Islam’s (Muslim’s) own behaviour and aggression, Muslims have at last pushed the West to the limits of their tolerance and have also exhibited that Islam is not just a religion, but a political cult that is determined to dominate and rule the world in accordance to the tenets of the Quran. Hence, the West has finally had enough and is starting to fight back.
(2420)

ISLAM – A religion or political ideology?

Is Islam a religion in the same sense as Christianity or Buddism or Hinduism, or Lutheranism, Presbyterianism, Catholicism or Judism?  Absolutely not!  Islam is an agressive, warring, political ideology.  Pat Robertson is “politically incorrect”, but correct nonetheless when he declares Islam to be an ideology more than just a religion.  Even ex-Muslims declare Islam is not a religion.  It is odd that those who suggest Islam is an all-encompassing “ideology” rather than just a “relgion” are often accused of being bigots or Islamophobes.  Those accusers are either grossly ignorant of Islam or are purposely being deceptive.
Read more about why Islam should NOT be protected as a “religion” under the US Constitution HERE.
Islam is an all encompassing ideology that has its own legal, moral, social, military, financial as well as religions codes. (See “Sharia law“).  As one Islamic website describes:  “Islam is a complete way of life. It impacts every part of life, from eating and sleeping to working and playing. It is not only a personal religion, but also a social one” – putting it mildly.
This distinction between Islam and all other religions is described clearly in this commentary.
In its purest fundamental form, it is a fascist, top down political system.  Granted, not all Muslims practice Islam so completely, especially in non-Muslim countries.  (See “moderate” Muslim.)  Their practice becomes more complete and all-encompassing the greater the number concentrated in a particular area.  They are emboldened by their numbers to practice purer forms of their all-encompassing ideology.  They enlarge their numbers through varying degrees of influence, coercion, or violent terrorism, depending on the nation they are in.  In the US, Muslims most often work to “influence”, or in Christian terms, “evangelize”. In political terms, they are lobbyists for their cause.  In commercial terms, they are promoters of their cause.  Of course, there is the occasional “sudden Jihadi syndrome” that erupts in violent acts such as at Fort Hood. Or intricately planned attacks such as 9-11.   In countries with greater concentrations of Muslims, they are more agressive, practicing more overt forms of coercion often through fairly frequent acts of terror.  And in Islamic nations that are threatened with western intervention, terror acts are daily occurrances.
What is the rationale for proclaiming Islam an “ideology” rather than merely a protected “religion?”  It is this.  If Christian churches throughout this land trained their flocks in political action, advocated a foreign, fascist political system, preached hatred toward other religions, and sent funds to foreign movements to support anti-American activities, they would most certainly lose their tax exempt status.  They would no longer be classified as “houses of worship” but would be classified as houses of political action – actually sedititious political action.  That is exactly what is being taught and promoted in Islamic mosques and “training centers”  throughout this country.  CAIR is being exposed for their seditious actions.  If we can refrain from being politically correct long enough to act on what is going on in Islamic centers and Mosques, Islam will be correctly classified what it is – a fascist political movement more than a “religion.”  See examples hereherehere, and here.
Are there any conditions under which a self-declared “religion” could or should lose its protected status as a “religion” in the United States and be outlawed?  In reality, the trend is in the opposite direction, toward suppressing the freedom of speech to express not only opinions, but facts, about a religion. [3]

Reference

[1] 1389 Blog-Counterjihad: https://mbplee.wordpress.com/2015/11/28/1389-blog-counterjihad/

[2] The Final and Only Solution to Islamic Jihad: https://wordpress.com/post/mbplee.wordpress.com/2549

[3] Islam: Religion or a Political Ideology: https://sites.google.com/site/islamicthreatsimplified/a-religion-or-political-ideology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: