Enough is Enough: Ban the Quran by Geert Wilders
I have been saying it for years: there is no such thing as ‘moderate Islam’.
Those who refuse to believe this should read the text of a speech by the Italian writer Oriana Fallaci (who, unfortunately, died last year), which she held in New York on November 28, 2005, when she was awarded a prize for her heroic resistance against Islamofascism and for her battle for freedom:
“Moderate Islam does not exist.And it does not exist because there is not such a thing as Good Islam and Bad Islam. There is Islam and that’s all. And Islam is the Koran. Nothing but the Koran. And the Koran is the Mein Kampf of a religion which has always aimed to eliminate the others….which calls non-Muslims infidel-dogs, meaning inferior beings. Read it over, that Mein Kampf. Whatever the version, you find out that all the evil which the sons of Allah commit against us and against themselves comes from that book.” (Oriana Fallaci, The Force of Reason, post-script, p. 305, February 2006).
Ehsan Jami is such an infidel dog, a renegade Muslim who had the courage to declare that the prophet Mohammed was a criminal and that certain passages from the Koran are totally backward. And who got it into his head to defend other dissenting infidels, and actually founded a committee for that very purpose. Allah rules that dissent should be punished by death. Last Saturday this almost became a reality when Jami, the unbeliever, was beaten up and seriously injured by two Moroccans and a Somali.
Enough is enough. Let’s put an end to all this politically correct twisting and turning. It’s all very well and good that Jami now has the protection he deserves, but it is a disgrace that it took so long and that the root of the problem has not been eliminated. The root of the problem is fascist Islam, the sick ideology of Allah and Mohammed as laid down in the Islamic Mein Kampf: the Koran. In this regard, the texts from the Koran speak for themselves.
In various suras Muslims are summoned to oppress, prosecute or kill Jews, Christians, renegades and non-believers, to beat and rape women and to establish a worldwide Islamic state through violence. I’ve lost count of the number of suras that incite Muslims to spread death and destruction.
Why don’t we ban that miserable book? After all, we also decided to ban Mein Kampf! This would bring the message home to those who assaulted Jami and to other Islamists that in this country the Koran should never, absolutely never, be used as a source of inspiration or an excuse for violence.
Politicians in this country fill me with shame. I am ashamed of their naivety and of their sickly search for a utopian moderate Islam, that would create a hell on earth in this country. And I am also ashamed for all those in the Cabinet and the Lower House of Parliament who simply refuse to put an end to this invasion of the Netherlands. I am deeply ashamed of Dutch politicians who, day in and day out, accept the over-representation of immigrants in our crime statistics as a fact of life and fail to come up with an answer.
The Hague is a lair of cowardice. It is full of scared people who were born as cowards and who will die as cowards: people who think that Dutch culture is, or should be embedded in a Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition. People who are prepared to grant a blanket pardon to liars and criminals. People who turn a blind eye when homosexuals are beaten up, as now occurs on an almost daily basis. People who actually propose to introduce Sharia mortgages.
People who are prepared to talk to representatives of the terrorist Hamas movement. People who render services to the dictatorial King of Morocco. Who accept extremists of the Muslim Brotherhood as their discussion partners. Who do not object when Muslim men refuse to allow their wives to be treated by male doctors. Who simply ignore the interests of Dutch citizens and collaborate in the transformation of the Netherlands into Nether-Arabia, as a province of the Islamic super-state of Eurabia.
I am fed up with Islam in the Netherlands: let’s put a stop to the influx of Muslim immigrants. I am fed up with the worshipping of Allah and Mohammed in the Netherlands: let’s put a stop to the building of mosques. I am fed up with the Koran in the Netherlands: let’s ban that fascist book.
Geert Wilders, MP, Chairman of the Party for Freedom
Geert Wilders is one of very few European politicians who has been outspoken about true Islam and Islam’s incompatibility with the European civilisation. The only way to defend Western civilisation from the curse of Islam is to ban the Quran that has been responsible for instilling and promoting all the hatred and violence for the past 1400 years. In fact the Quran has been responsible for poisoning the minds of Muslims in a more positive and dangerous way than even Mein Kampf ever did because Muslims believe that the Quran is the literal word of Allah. This makes the Quran immutable and sacred to the believer of Islam. This is the reason the Quran does so much more damage.
The Quran was the work of a bitter, vengeful, rejected man, Muhammad who used the myth of the angel Gabriel and the myth of Allah to justify his hatred of Jews, Christians and pagans who rejected his preachings. But the words of the Quran, so full of hatred and vengeance that it has caused death and violence over the past 1400 years and intends to continue doing so until Islam rules the world. The evidence of this violence is historical for all to see, and his violence in there daily for all living persons to observe. These are facts not prejudice. The Quran is a work of Political Supremacist Facism veiled with a thin veneer of religion that applies only to Muslims, hence it should be classified as a fascist political ideology rather than a religious doctrine, and thus banned just as Mein Kampf was banned.
Digging deeper into Islam this is what an Islamic scholar believes:
Qutb’s theoretical work on Islamic advocacy, social justice and education, has left a significant mark on the Muslim Brotherhood (at least outside of Egypt).
[Qutb] dismissed Western achievements as entirely material, arguing that ‘nothing will satisfy its own conscience and justify its existence.'[n. 12] 
Three basic themes emerge from Qutb’s writings. ***First, he claimed that the world was beset with barbarism, licentiousness, and unbelief (a condition he called jahiliyya, the religious term for the period of ignorance prior to the revelations given to the Prophet Mohammed). ***Qutb argued that humans can choose only between Islam and jahiliyya. ***Second, he warned that more people, including Muslims, were attracted to jahiliyya and its material comforts than to his view of Islam; jahiliyya could therefore triumph over Islam. ***Third, no middle ground exists in what Qutb conceived as a struggle between God and Satan. ***All Muslim—as he defined them—therefore must take up arms in this fight. Any Muslim who rejects his ideas is just one more nonbeliever worthy of destruction.
To me, this sounds like a call to all Muslims for genocide against all infidels. We cannot tolerate such a fascist doctrine to exist in our world. We have to ban the Quran and belief in Islam. The ideology is alien to the Western Democratic philosophy and a threat to Western civilisation. Banning the Quran will remove the constant reminder for Muslims to carry out Islamic Jihad against all infidels and to make such a repulsive ideology unacceptable to our civilisation.
the action or offence of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.
But if gods only existed in mythology, can you commit blasphemy against a myth? NO!
Scientist provides evidence that God does not exist
“The God Delusion by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins is number nine on the New York Times Best Seller List dated February 4, 2007; Sam Harris’s atheistic response to critics, Letter to a Christian Nation, sits at twenty-six. In interviews, both men have directed readers to an additional work that continues the “new atheism” trend: God: The Failed Hypothesis (Prometheus Books, January 30, 2007.)
In God: The Failed Hypothesis, physicist Victor Stenger argues that science has advanced sufficiently to make a definitive statement on the existence or nonexistence of the traditional Judeo-Christian-Islamic God. He invites readers to put their minds–and the scientific method–to work to test this claim.
After evaluating all the scientific evidence–the studies done by reputable institutions on the power of prayer; the writings of philosophers who have puzzled over the problem of God and of good and evil; the efforts of biblical scholars to prove the accuracy of holy scriptures; and the work of biologists, geologists, and astronomers looking for clues to a creator on Earth and in the cosmos–Stenger concludes that beyond a reasonable doubt the universe and life appear exactly as we might expect if there were no God. He convincingly shows that not only is there no evidence for the existence of God, but scientific observations actually point to his nonexistence.”
So accusations of blasphemy are mostly unsubstantiated and is simple prejudice.